Joseph Smith said that “The Priesthood is an everlasting
principle, and existed with God from eternity, and will to eternity, without
beginning of days or end of years.” (TPJS, p. 157). Since the priesthood is a
principle, we ought to understand what a principle is and how the priesthood
could be defined as a principle. Some relevant definitions of ‘principle’ include;
a rule of conduct, elemental aspect of a craft or discipline, and a law
comprehending many subordinate truths, such as the principles of morality, law,
and government. If we define the priesthood as God’s work, then it is a
principle in the sense that it is a rule of conduct on how to bring to pass the
eternal life of man and in the sense that it is a craft or discipline to save
men. It is also a principle in the sense that it is a law comprehending many
subordinate truths, because Joseph Smith also said that “[the Melchizedek]
Priesthood is a perfect law of theocracy, and stands as God to give laws to the
people, administering endless lives to the sons and daughters of Adam.” (TPJS,
p. 322).
In addition to defining the priesthood as a principle,
Joseph Smith also talked about “the principle of love” (TPJS, p. 313), “the principle
of mercy” (TPJS, p. 155), “the principle of wisdom” (TPJS, p. 119), “the
principle of repentance” (TPJS, p. 81), “the principle of knowledge” (TPJS, p.
297), and “the principle of salvation” (TPJS, p. 297). Priesthood, or the work
of God, is a principle just like love, mercy, wisdom, repentance, knowledge, and
salvation are principles.
Brigham Young also understood the priesthood as enveloping a
system of principles:
“Eternal existence depends
solely upon adopting and carrying out in our lives the principles couched in the term “holy Priesthood,” which alone
tend to life and eternal duration and exaltation. We are seeking for something
that we are not now in possession of; and every individual wishes to understand
those true principles which will put him in possession of the right plan by
which to obtain what we are seeking.” (JD, Volume 7, p. 201-206).
No comments:
Post a Comment